MATRIK: Journal of Management, Informatics and Computer Engineering follows a strict and transparent review process to ensure the quality and credibility of published articles. This journal adheres to the double-blind (double anonymous) peer-review type, where the identities of the author and reviewer are kept confidential during the review process.

Submission and Initial Evaluation
All manuscripts submitted to MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer undergo initial evaluation by the editorial team to assess suitability and compliance with the journal's scope and guidelines. Manuscripts that pass the initial evaluation are given a unique identification number for further processing.

Peer Review
Each eligible manuscript is then sent for review to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers are carefully selected based on their expertise, experience, and previous contributions to the field. If there are differences of opinion, additional reviewers may be assigned to provide a comprehensive evaluation.

Double Blind Review
MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer ensures a double-blind (double anonymous) peer-review process, where the identities of the author and reviewer are kept confidential from each other. This helps maintain objectivity and fairness in the evaluation process, minimizing the potential for bias.

Review Criteria
Reviewers are asked to assess submitted manuscripts based on scientific quality, originality, relevance to the scope of the journal, clarity of presentation, and compliance with ethical guidelines. Constructive input and suggestions for improvement are highly expected to help authors improve the quality of their work.

Review Duration
MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer strives to provide timely and efficient peer review. Reviewers are usually given a certain time period to complete their evaluation. Authors will be notified of the expected duration of the review process during initial submission or after significant revisions.

Decisions and Revisions
After completing the peer review process, the editorial team considers the reviewers' comments and recommendations. The author will receive a decision, which may include acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection. If there is a request for revision, the author is expected to respond to all reviewer comments thoroughly and resubmit the revised manuscript within the specified time period.

Editorial Decision
The final decision regarding publication of the manuscript rests with the Editor-in-Chief or members of the Editorial Board. The editorial team carefully considers the reviewer's judgment, originality of the work, relevance to the scope of the journal, and compliance with ethical standards before making a final decision.

Confidentiality
MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer maintains strict confidentiality of the peer review process. Reviewers are required to treat the manuscript and its contents as a confidential document and must not disclose any information to unauthorized persons.

Review Process Improvements
MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer continues to strive to improve its review process. Author and reviewer input was invaluable in this effort. The journal welcomes constructive input and suggestions to improve the efficiency and fairness of the review process.

Contact
If you have questions or inquiries regarding publication ethics, please contact the editorial team at matrix@universitasbumigora.ac.id