EVALUASI PRODUK PEMBELAJARAN MULTIMEDIA (PELIN) EVALUATION OF LEARNING MULTIMEDIA PRODUCT (PELIN)
Abstract
This paper purpose is to discover shortcomings of multimedia product of Pelin and to conduct a survey to users of multimedia Pelin . Pelin is an online e-learning multimedia for students of Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer (STMIK) Bumigora Mataram, which is able the students to upload task file and download learning material. Pelin system is based on restful webservice that can provide distant learning. There are four levels of evaluation, those are reaction, learning, behavior and result. The formative evaluations result show: the Pelin multimedia disadvantages are: not supports interactive face to face learning, not facilitates audio communication, not be fully user friendly, could not upload graphic and image files, not be provided by feedback facility of test result and also not have help menus. The summative evaluation result found that the Pelin Multimedia is supports independent learning, provides web-client application, improves reaction of student to learn, increases student knowledge comprehension, increases learning behavior, and gives good learning result. Statistical comparison tests found there are significant differences influence the implementation of Pelin and there is no difference in terms of the level of reaction, learning and behavior towards the use of Pelin for S1 and D3 students.
Downloads
References
[2] Luther, A. C. (1996). Authoring Interactive Multimedia. AP Professional, Boston.
[3] Lee, W.W., & Owens, D.L. (2004). Multimedia-Based Instructional Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[4] Mulyanta., & Leong, M. (2009). Tutorial Membangun Multimedia Iteraktif: Media Pembelajaran. Universitas Atmajaya, Yogyakarta
[5] Suparman, M. A. (2014). Desain Instruksional Modern: Panduan Para Pengajar dan Inovator Pendidikan. Erlangga
[6] Sutopo, A. H. (2012). Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi dalam Pendidikan. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta
[7] Kirkpatrick, D. (1994). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berret-Koeler, San Francisco
[8] Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and Learning at a Distance. Pearson
[9] Wagner, N., Hassanein K., & Head M. (2008). Who is responsible for ELearning Success in Higher Education? A Stakeholders' Analysis. Educational Technology & Society. Vol. 11 No.3. hal 26-36.
[10] Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2008). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. Pearson Merill Prentice Hall
[11] England, E. & Finney, A. (1999). Managing Multimedia: Project Management for Interactive Media. Pearson Education Limited
[12] Deporter, B. (2009). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Kaifa, Bandung
[13] Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2012). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Pearson
[14] Schwier, R. A, & Misanchuk, E. R. (1987). Interactive Multimedia Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
[15] Novisemood. (2012). Sistem Operasi pada PC, Tablet (Ipad), dan Handphone. Diambil tanggal 4 Juli 2016 dari https://novisemood.wordpress.com/2012/ 02/24/sistem-operasi-pada-pctabletipaddan-handphone/
[16] Kuncara, P. (2016). Perbedaan Ekstensi Gambar JPG, GIF, PNG, BMP dan TIFF, diambil tanggal 5 Juli 2016 dari http://klikhost.com/perbedaan-ekstensigambar-jpg-gif-png-bmp-dan-tiff/
[17] Given, B.K., & Deporter, B. (1992). The Quantum Learning System: Excellence in Teaching and Learning. United States of America.
[18] Gleder, M. E. (2012). Learning and Instruction: Theory and Application. Pearson.
[19] Munthe, A.P. (2015). Pentingnya Evaluasi Program di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat. Scholaria. Vol.5, No.2. Hal. 1-14. [20] Kamsin, A. (2005). Is E-Learning the Solution and Substitute for Conventional Learning?. International Journal of The Computer, the Internet and Management Vol. 13.No.3. hal. 79-89
.png)
