Algorithms Error in The VisualGSCA Program

  • Thesa Adi Purwanto Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: GSCA; Software; Algorithms;

Abstract

The VisualGSCA program uses an incorrect algorithm, which results in scale inconsistencies between observed and latent variables. The observed variable is standardized, while the latent variable is normalized. This affects the calculation of the wrong estimate parameter value and the goodness-fit value of FIT and AFIT becomes inaccurate. This error occurs because the algorithm used is not a pure GSCA algorithm but a reduced GSCA algorithm that ignores the structural model, resulting in an incorrect FIT value. This study aims to prove that the old version of the GSCA program has problems using its algorithm so that it can affect the results of its statistical calculations. The data used in this study are data from previous studies that have been processed with the old version of the GSCA program, so that the results can be compared with the latest version of the GSCA program. The results obtained prove that there are indeed differences in the value of the Loading Factor and FIT, so that research that has been done previously needs to be reanalyzed using the latest program.

References

Arifin, M. (2016). Impact of E-Banking User Behavior to Loyalty. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(1), 90–97.
Bharata, W., & Widyaningrum, P. W. (2017). Analisis Penerimaan Dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Akademik Melalui Pengembangan Model Utaut Studi Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo. Optimal: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.33558/optimal.v11i2.751
Ekasari, D. F. (2018). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) pada Pemodelan Kemiskinan Dan Dimensi Kepuasan Hidup Di Indonesia Tahun 2017. PROSIDING SENDIKA, 4(1).
Henseler, J. (2012a). A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling: A Rejoinder. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585305
Henseler, J. (2012b). Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6
Hwang, H. (2008). VisualGSCA 1.0 – A Graphical User Interface Software Program for Generalized Structured Component Analysis. In T. H. K. Shigemasu, A. Okada, T. Imaizumi (Ed.), New Trends in Psychometrics (pp. 1–10). University Academic Press.
Hwang, H., Malhotra, N. K., Kim, Y., Tomiuk, M. A., & Hong, S. (2010). A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.699
Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2004). Generalized structured component analysis. Psychometrika, 69(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295841
Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2014). Generalized structured component analysis: A component-based approach to structural equation modeling. In Generalized Structured Component Analysis: A Component-Based Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17872
Jung, K., Takane, Y., Hwang, H., & Woodward, T. S. (2012). Dynamic GSCA (Generalized Structured Component Analysis) with Applications to the Analysis of Effective Connectivity in Functional Neuroimaging Data. Psychometrika, 77(4), 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9284-2
Kumala, I. R. (2020). Pengaruh 4P dan Kualitas Layanan terhadap Kinerja Pemasaran melalui Motivasi Membeli - Agen Perusahaan PT. Eratama Putra Mandiri Banyuwangi. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen (JIMMU), 3(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.33474/manajemen.v3i2.1576
Ristianto, A. ., & Fauziah, I. (2016). Hubungan Profesionalisme, Motivasi Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisifatif Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Generalized Structured Component Analysis (SEM-GSCA). Jurnal “LOG!K@,” 6(2), 112–130.
Schlittgen, R. (2018). Estimation of generalized structured component analysis models with alternating least squares. Computational Statistics, 33(1), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-017-0723-5
Suk, H. W., & Hwang, H. (2016). Functional Generalized Structured Component Analysis. Psychometrika, 81(4), 940–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9521-1
Tenenhaus, M. (2008). Component-based structural equation modelling. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 19(7–8), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802159543
Triyanti, D. P. B. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Koperasi, Umkm, Perindustrian Dan Perdagangan Kabupaten Barito Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik & Bisnis, 3(1), 87–101.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wahyu Widyaningrum, P. (2017). Pengaruh Label Halal dan Celebrity Endorser terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Survei pada Konsumen Wardah di Ponorogo). In JESI (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia) (Vol. 6, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.21927/JESI.2016.6(2).%P
Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
[1]
T. Purwanto, “Algorithms Error in The VisualGSCA Program”, Jurnal Varian, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 125 - 132, Apr. 2021.
Section
Articles