English Language Acquisition through Parliamentary Debating: A Case Study at Politeknik Kesehatan Mataram

Authors

  • Erwin Suhendra Universitas Bumigora, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Kamil Syarifaturrahman Universitas Bumigora, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Lalu Arwan Darmajaya Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes, Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i1.5720

Keywords:

British Parliamentary Debat, Language Fluency, Pragmatic Competence, Second Language Acquisition, Sociocultural Mediation, Task-Based Learning

Abstract

British Parliamentary (BP) debate is widely adopted in EFL/ESP classrooms, but prior studies often report score gains without explaining how debate drives language development. This study aimed to trace the mechanisms by which BP debate fosters L2 acquisition, focusing on fluency, discourse organisation, and pragmatic competence. Using a qualitative research method with process tracing, eight medical ESP students at Politeknik Kesehatan Mataram completed four full BP rounds. Multimodal data included audio–video recordings of speeches and POIs, written texts from case building, observational notes, and reflective journals/interviews. Data were transcribed and analysed through reflexive thematic analysis guided by three constructs: noticing, modified output, and mediation. Results show a consistent input–processing–output–mediation cycle: self-repairs declined while lexical precision increased; signposting and connectors became denser and more strategic; POIs/rebuttals featured clearer negotiation through hedging, uptake, and reformulation; and adjudicator feedback catalysed planned changes in subsequent rounds, indicating developing self-regulation. Overall, BP debate functions as a rich, mechanism-rich environment that integrates sociocultural mediation with interactionist learning, transforming performance from mechanical repetition to purposeful, confident communication. These findings support using BP debate as an authentic task-based pedagogy for ESP learners.

References

Adewumi, I., & Adewumi, I. O. (2025, September 2). Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint). https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.83396

Andersen, P. T., Loncarevic, N., Damgaard, M. B., Jacobsen, M. W., Bassioni-Stamenic, F., & Eklund Karlsson, L. (2022). Public health, surveillance policies and actions to prevent community spread of COVID-19 in Denmark, Serbia and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 50(6), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948211056215

Ariaans, M., & Reibling, N. (2024). Constructions of Unemployed Individuals in German Parliamentary Debates on Active Labour Market Policy Reforms: A Comparative Analysis of 2003 and 2016. Social Policy and Society, 23(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000890

Arif, H., & Naeem, J. (2025). The Impact of Generative Ai on Learner Autonomy and Critical Thinking in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Writing Classrooms. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(3), 2264–2275. https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1249

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021, October 13). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE.

Castro, P. A. (2005). Introduction: A focus on foreign language learners’ success. Revista de Lengua para Fines Específicos 21.1. https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2015.0001

Chaparro-Moreno, L. J., Justice, L. M., Logan, J. A. R., Purtell, K. M., & Lin, T.-J. (2019). The preschool classroom linguistic environment: Children’s first-person experiences (M. Rabinowitz, Ed.). PLOS ONE, 14(8), e0220227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220227

Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429

Crible, L., & Degand, L. (2019). Domains and Functions: A Two-Dimensional Account of Discourse Markers. Discours, (24). https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.9997

Dumlao, R. P., & Wilang, J. D. (2019). Variations in the Use of Discourse Markers by L1 and L2 English Users. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.15206

Fitzpatrick, T., & Thwaites, P. (2020). Word association research and the L2 lexicon. Language Teaching, 53(3), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000105

Garcia, M. H., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2021). Culturally Sustaining Disciplinary Literacy for Bi/Multilingual Learners: Creating a Translanguaging Social Studies Classroom (C. Monte-Sano, Ed.). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(4), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1129

Gilfoyle, M., MacFarlane, A., Hughes, Z., & Salsberg, J. (2024). Understanding the evolution of trust in a participatory health research partnership: A qualitative study. Health Expectations, 27(1), e13918. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13918

Gunawan, J. (2015). Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Belitung Nursing Journal, 1(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4

Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Effects of Chatbot-Assisted in-Class Debates on Students’ Argumentation Skills and Task Motivation. Computers & Education, 203, 104862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862

Huang, L., Zhou, J., Xue, J., Li, Y., & Du, Y. (2017). DACE: Extracting and Exploring Large Scale Chinese Web Collocations with Distributed Computing. American Journal of Information Systems, 5(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajis-5-1-4

Infante, P., & Poehner, M. (2019). Realizing the ZPD in Second Language Education. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.38916

Inya, O. (2025). ‘I Cannot Overreach the Senate’ : Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 60(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231168056

Karışan, D., Yılmaz Tüzün, Ö., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Quality of preservice teachers argumentation in socioscientific issues context. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(4), 3504. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i4.4949

Khoza-Shangase, K., & Sebothoma, B. (2022). Tele-audiology and preventive audiology: A capacity versus demand challenge imperative in South Africa. In K. Khoza-Shangase (Ed.), Preventive audiology: An African perspective (1st ed., pp. 21–40). AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2022.BK209.02

Komoder, A., Venaruzzo, L., & Young, C. (2023). Up-skilling learners through story-telling: Introducing the Learning Wave. ASCILITE Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.468

Kouhia, A. (2023). Crafts in the Time of Coronavirus: Pandemic Domestic Crafting in Finland on Instagram’s Covid-Related Craft Posts. M/C Journal, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2932

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2023). Sociocultural Theory and Classroom Second Language Learning in the East Asian Context: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, 107(S1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12816

Lawal, Y. A., Ayanleke, A. O., & Oshin, I. I. (2024). The Impact of AI Techniques on Human-AI Interaction Quality in Project Management: A Mixed-Methods Study. Organization and Human Capital Development, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31098/orcadev.v3i2.2307

Leaver, T., & Srdarov, S. (2023). ChatGPT Isn’t Magic: The Hype and Hypocrisy of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Rhetoric. M/C Journal, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.3004

Li, S., Wang, Z., & Ge, X. (2025). Effects of Task Complexity and L2 Proficiency on Functional Adequacy in L2 Writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12636

Lietz, C. A., Langer, C. L., & Furman, R. (2006). Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Social Work: Implications from a Study Regarding Spirituality. Qualitative Social Work, 5(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006070288

Here is the cleaned list for your latest set of citations. I have removed the extra line breaks so that each entry is properly formatted as a single continuous paragraph.

Lin, M.-C. (2024). Exploring the Effects of Argumentation-Based Inquiry in Dual-Language Courses on EFL Students’ Oral Presentation Skills and Willingness-to-Communicate. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2429873. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2429873

Lin, Y.-L., Tsai, Y.-C., & Hsieh, C.-Y. C. (2024). Discourse Competence Across Band Scores: An Analysis of Speaking Performance in the General English Proficiency Test. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 1719–1746. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0154

Long, M. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.

Mackie, B., Weber, S., Mitchell, M., Hammad, K., Wong, D. F., Crilly, J., Boyd, M., Wullschleger, M., & Ranse, J. (2024). Strategies to Strengthen Hospital Response for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Incident: A Multisite Study. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 18, e292. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.151

Majidi, A. E., Graaff, R. D., & Janssen, D. (2023). Debate Pedagogy as a Conducive Environment for L2 Argumentative Essay Writing. Language Teaching Research, 13621688231156998. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231156998

Majidi, A. E., Janssen, D., & De Graaff, R. (2021). The Effects of in-Class Debates on Argumentation Skills in Second Language Education. System, 101, 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576

Mesa, M. d. M., Valor, D., Montes, A., & García-Casas, I. (2025). Energy Under Debate: Fostering Critical Thinking in Chemical Engineering Through in-Class Debates. Education for Chemical Engineers, 51, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.03.002

Mykkänen, J., Repo, P., & Matschoss, K. (2024). Energy Agendas: A Longitudinal Analysis of Finnish Parliamentary Debates. Scandinavian Political Studies, 47(2), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12266

Ochieng’ Ong’ondo, C., & Borg, S. (2011). ‘We teach plastic lessons to please them’: The influence of supervision on the practice of English language student teachers in Kenya. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412881

Parrish, C. W., Guffey, S. K., Williams, D. S., Estis, J. M., & Lewis, D. (2021). Fostering Cognitive Presence, Social Presence and Teaching Presence with Integrated Online—Team-Based Learning. TechTrends, 65(4), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00598-5

Perry, L. K., Prince, E. B., Valtierra, A. M., Rivero-Fernandez, C., Ullery, M. A., Katz, L. F., Laursen, B., & Messinger, D. S. (2018). A year in words: The dynamics and consequences of language experiences in an intervention classroom (N. O. Schiller, Ed.). PLOS ONE, 13(7), e0199893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199893

Ren, S., & Cui, Y. (2025). A Study of Discourse Markers in Foreign Language Classrooms from the Perspective of Conversation Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(9), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v9i9.12431

Sari, N. M., & Abrar, M. (2024). Use of Technology in English Language Learning: Challenges and Benefits. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 7(2), 362–372. https://journal.ipm2kpe.or.id/index.php/LEEA/article/view/10034

Schwalbach, J. (2023). Talking to the Populist Radical Right: A Comparative Analysis of Parliamentary Debates. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12397

Schwartz, E. (2016). Developing Green Cities: Explaining Variation in Canadian Green Building Policies. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423916000846

Scott, S. (2008). Perceptions of Students’ Learning Critical Thinking through Debate in a Technology Classroom: A Case Study. Journal of Technology Studies, 34(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v34i1.a.5

Sholeh, M. I., Azah, N., Arifin, Z., Rosyidi, H., Sokip, S., Syafi’I, A., & Sahri, S. (2024). Development of a Multicultural Curriculum to Enhance Student Tolerance in Senior High School. IJE : Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 2(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v2i3.147

Simister, N., & Scholz, V. (2017). Process Training.

Sirine, H., Andadari, R. K., & Suharti, L. (2020). Social Engagement Network and Corporate Social Entrepreneurship in Sido Muncul Company, Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 885–892. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO11.885

Slapin, J., & Proksch, S.-O. (2021, October 8). Theories and Empirical Applications of Legislative Debate. In The Politics of Legislative Debates (pp. 34–50). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849063.003.0003

Sodiqova, D. (2023). Making Effective Oral Presentations in Esl. Teaching Foreign Languages in the Context of Sustainable Development: Best Practices, Problems and Opportunities, 492–497. https://doi.org/10.37547/geo-91

Soozandehfar, S. M. A., University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran, Souzandehfar, M., & Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of Translation Studies, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran. (2022). A Socioculturally Microgenetic Scrutiny on the Mediational Role of Teacher/Peer Scaffolding via Dialogic Collaboration in EFL Speaking Development. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, 4(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.52547/ieepj.4.1.156

Spies, G. M., Delport, C. S. L., & Le Roux, M. P. (2015). Developing Safety and Risk Assessment Tools and Training Materials: A Researcher-practice Dialogue. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(6), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514565393

Sukino, S., Jobih, J., Nurcahyo, R., Aruan, D. A., Aryana, I. N. R., & Chandra, A. S. (2025). Panduan National University Debating Championship & Kompetisi Debat Mahasiswa Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Syväterä, J., Rautalin, M., & Magyari, A. K. (2023). From where do legislators draw scientific knowledge? Organizations as scientific authorities in four countries’ parliamentary debates. The British Journal of Sociology, 74(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12989

Thomson, J. J. (2021, December). Metadiscourse in Upper Secondary English Essays: Exploring Genres in L1 and L2 Educational Contexts. University of Stavanger. https://doi.org/10.31265/usps.121

Truan, N. (2021). Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse: Constructing the ethos of the receptive politician. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(4), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20018.tru

Tsunemoto, A., & Trofimovich, P. (2024). Coherence and comprehensibility in second language speakers’ academic speaking performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(3), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000305

Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America’s Future. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 75(3), 212–214. https://doi.org/10.56315/PSCF12-23Twenge

Wambsganss, T., Caines, A., & Buttery, P. (2022). ALEN App: Argumentative Writing Support To Foster English Language Learning. Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2022), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.bea-1.18

Wandani, S. D. A., Ali, M., Maksum, M. N. R., & Alauddin, M. B. (2022). Principal’s Strategy in Developing Teacher’s Pedagogic Competencies in the Distance Learning. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i2.2595

Yazdanmehr, E., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Saghafi, K. (2021). A process tracing study of the dynamic patterns of boredom in an online L3 course of German during COVID-19 pandemic. Foreign Language Annals, 54(3), 714–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12548

Yüzlü, M. Y., & Atay, D. (2020). The effectiveness of L1 use in promoting oral production in L2 across different proficiency levels. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalı ̧smaları Dergisi, 16(2), 864–882. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759330

Downloads

Published

2025-12-27

How to Cite

Suhendra, E., Syarifaturrahman, W. K., & Darmajaya, L. A. (2025). English Language Acquisition through Parliamentary Debating: A Case Study at Politeknik Kesehatan Mataram. Humanitatis : Journal of Language and Literature, 12(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i1.5720