Efek Chat Generative Pre-training Transformer terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Computational Thinking Mahasiswa dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah di Era Revolusi Industri 5.0
Abstract
Di era perkembangan teknologi, kecerdasan buatan seperti ChatGPT (Generative Pre-training Transformer) telah muncul sebagai alat yang berpotensi mendukung proses pembelajaran serta pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan Computational Thinking (CT) terutama dalam konteks penulisan karya ilmiah. Oleh karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan ChatGPT terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan mengetahui pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap CT. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 40 mahasiswa program studi ilmu komputer yang mengambil mata kuliah riset teknologi informasi. Teknik dan instrumen pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi sederhana. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan penggunaan ChatGPT terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis, serta terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan kemampuan berpikir kritis terhadap CT. Implikasi hasil penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai referensi ilmiah bagi peneliti selanjutnya yang akan mengkaji lebih mendalam terkait pengaruh penggunaan ChatGPT terhadap kemampuan berpikir dan CT mahasiswa yang memiliki potensi besaruntuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran.
References
computational thinking dalam proses pembejaran. J-Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat,
2(8):5867–5874. https://doi.org/10.53625/jabdi.v2i8.4516.
Angeli, C. and Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges.
Computers in Human Behavior, 105:106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185.
Atmojo, W. T., Ayunda, A. T., Audrey, K. K., Mareti, G. T., and Christopher (2024). Peningkatan pema-
haman computational thinking dalam rangkat menghadapi era society 5.0. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada
Masyarakat Nusantara, 5(1):1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.55338/jpkmn.v5i1.2935.
Azizah, N. I., Roza, Y., and Maimunah, M. (2022). Computational thinking process of high school
students in solving sequences and series problems. Jurnal Analisa, 8(1):21–35. https://doi.org/
10.15575/ja.v8i1.17917.
Bachtiar, A. and Andrian, R. (2024). Dampak ChatGPT dalam pengembangan front-end dengan fokus
pada reactjs. Jurnal Media Computer Science, 3(1):79–82. https://doi.org/10.37676/jmcs.
v3i1.4361.
Buseic, V. (2023). Teaching information literacy and critical thinking skills in ChatGPT time. In 2023
International Conference on Computing, Networking, Telecommunications Engineering Sciences Ap-
plications (CoNTESA), pages 14–20, Zagreb. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoNTESA61248.2023.
10384921.
Dag, F., Sumuer, E., and Durdu, L. (2023). The effect of an unplugged coding course on primary school
students’ improvement in their computational thinking skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
39(6):1902–1918. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12850.
Dani, R. W. (2023). Analisis peran Artificial intelligence (AI) dalam penulisan karya ilmiah pada
ChatGPT-3,5 dari OpenAI. In International Seminar on Adab and Humanities, pages 187–200.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., and Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking,
cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: Exploring the relationship between
computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4):355–
369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9.
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., and Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on
cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational
Large Language Models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6:100198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198.
Febrian, W. D., Weraman, P., Moridu, I., Utama, I. W. K., Rukiyanto, B. A., and Arifianto, T. (2024). Peng-
gunaan aplikasi Turnitin dan ChatGPT dalam penyusunan karya ilmiah terindeks Scopus. Communnity
Development Journal, 5(1):961–975. https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v5i1.24971.
Giray, L. (2023). Prompt engineering with ChatGPT: A guide for academic writers. Annals of biomedical
engineering, 51(12):2629–2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4.
Hermansyah, D. and Aqodiah (2023). Evaluasi keaktifan mahasiswa dalam diskusi proses perkuliahan
berbantuan ChatGPT. Ulul Abab: Majalah Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, 27(2):1–9.
Huang, C. W., Coleman, M., Gachago, D., and Van Belle, J. P. (2023). Using ChatGPT to encourage
critical AI literacy skills and for assessment in higher education. In nnual Conference of the Southern
African Computer Lecturers’ Association, pages 105–118. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48536-7_8.
Ismarmiaty, Agustin, K., Madani, M., Sriwinarti, N. K., Zainuddin, and Supatmiwati, D. (2022). Pen-
guatan kemampuan computational thinking pada pemberdayaan guru dan siswa sekolah dasar di Pulau
Lombok. Transformasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 18(2):253–267. https://doi.org/10.
20414/transformasi.v18i2.5034.
Lee, U., Jung, H., Jeon, Y., Sohn, Y., Hwang, W., Moon, J., and Kim, H. (2023). Few-shot is enough:
Exploring ChatGPT prompt engineering method for automatic question generation in english ed-
ucation. Education and Information Technologies, pages 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10639-023-12249-8.
Lestari, I., Arifin, S. P., Widyasari, Y. D. L., Zain, M. M., and Rachmawati, H. (2023). The coaching
of Dunia Coding program to improve computational thinking ability at As Shofa Junior High School
Pekanbaru. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(1):136–146. https://doi.org/
10.31849/dinamisia.v7i1.12455.
Liao, J., Zhong, L., Zhe, L., Xu, H., Liu, M., and Xie, T. (2024). Scaffolding computational thinking with
ChatGPT. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, pages 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/
TLT.2024.3392896.
Lodi, M. and Martini, S. (2021). Computational thinking, between papert and wing. Science and
Education, 30:883–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00202-5.
Maharani, S., Kholid, M. N., Pradana, N. L., and Nusantara, T. (2019). Problem solving in the context
of computational thinking. Infinty: Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2):109–116. https:
//doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p109-116.
Mauliani, A. (2020). Peran penting computational thinking terhadap masa depan Bangsa Indonesia.
Jurnal Informatika dan Bisnis, 9(2):1–9.
Meiza, A. (2023). Statistika dasar untuk ilmu-ilmu sosial. Deepublish Publisher, Sleman.
Merentek, T. C., Usoh, E. J., and Lengkong, J. S. J. (2023). Implementasi kecerdasan buatan ChatGPT
dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3):26862–26869. https://doi.org/10.
31004/jptam.v7i3.10960.
Munawar, Z., Soerjono, H., Putri, N. I., Hemawati, and Dwijayanti, A. (2023). Manfaat kecerdasan
buatan ChatGPT untuk membantu penulisan ilmiah. Tematik: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi,
10(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.38204/tematik.v10i1.1291.
Novianti, N. and Dewi, N. (2023). The efforts to improve computational thinking in science learning
through Canva application. Report of Biological Education, 4(1):32–46. https://doi.org/10.
37150/rebion.v4i1.2010.
O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., and Hayes, N. (2022). Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - a systematic
literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46:101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.
2022.101110.
Ouaazki, A., Bergram, K., and Holzer, A. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT to enhance computational
thinking learning experiences. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and
Learning for Engineering (TALE), Auckland, New Zealand, pages 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/
TALE56641.2023.10398358.
Permana, F. C., Sari, M. P., Sylviani, S., Sari, I. P., Firmansyah, F. H., and Padmasari, A. C. (2022).
Pengenalan konsep Computational thinking bagi guru dalam menghadapi kurikulum dengan pem-
belajaran abad XXI di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pemanfaatan Teknologi untuk Masyarakat, 1(1):1–10.
https://doi.org/10.24198/dharmakarya.v12i2.36603.
Poulakis, E. and Politis, P. (2021). Computational thinking assessment: Literature review. Research on
E-Learning and ICT in Education: Technological, Pedagogical and Instructional Perspectives, pages
111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64363-8_7.
Putri, Z. H. A., Pradana, N. R., Yustraini, Y. A., and Efansya, A. D. (2024). Analisis pengaruh ChatGPT
terhadap Keterampilan, Kolaborasi, dan kreativitas mahasiswa : Metode systematic literature review
identifikasi dampak dan pengaruh. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(2):7983–7999.
https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i2.10268.
Rahma P, F. L., Putri, I. A., Tanjung, M. S., and Siregar, R. (2024). Studi literatur : Pentingnya
berpikir komputasional dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah Matematis peserta didik.
Bilangan: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian dan Angkasa, 2(2):17–27. https://doi.org/10.
62383/bilangan.v2i2.
Ria, R. R. P. and Susilowati, D. (2023a). Learning outcomes of a computer based test for computational
thinking based on local wisdom. International Education Trend Issues, 1(2):342–347. https:
//doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v1i3.303.
Ria, R. R. P. R. and Susilowati, D. (2023b). Validity and reliability diagnostic test computational thinking
based on local wisdom. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di
Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 9(4):1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.33394/
jk.v9i4.8991.
Rinaldi, M. and Gustina, I. (2022). Pengantar Statistika. Larispa Indonesia, Medan.
Riyanto, S. and Hatmawan, A. A. (2020). Metode riset penelitian kuantitatif penelitian di bidang
manajemen, teknik, pendidikan dan eksperimen. Deepublish Publisher, Sleman.
Roflin, E., Rohana, and Riana, F. (2022). Analisis korelasi dan regresi. NEM, Pekalongan.
Rusandi, M. A., Ahman, Saripah, I., Khairun, D. Y., and Mutmainah (2023). No worries with ChatGPT:
Building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills. Journal
of Publich Health, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad049.
Setiawan, A. and Luthfiyani, U. K. (2023). Penggunaan ChatGPT untuk pendidikan di era education
4.0: Usulan inovasi meningkatkan keterampilan menulis. Jurnal PETISI, 04(01):49–58. https:
//doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpetisi.v4i1.3680.
Sholihin, M. and Ratmono, D. (2020). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 - untuk hubungan non
linier dalam penelitian sosial dan bisnis. ANDI OFFSET, Yogyakarta.
Sondakh, D. E., Pungus, S. R., Maringka, R. C., and Tangka, G. M. W. (2024). Memperkenalkan
algoritma dan berpikir algoritmik kepada siswa sekolah dasar menggunakan CS unplugged. Sertivium
Smart Journal, 2(2):134–140. https://doi.org/10.31154/servitium.v2i2.29.
Sun, G. H. and Hoelscher, S. H. (2023). The ChatGPT storm and what faculty can do. Nurse Educator,
48(3):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001390.
Supena, I., Darmuki, A., and Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (constructive, critical, creativity,
collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction,
14(3):873–892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a.
Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C., and Hsu, C. Y. (2020). The computational thinking scale for computer literacy
education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4):579–602. https://doi.org/10.
1177/0735633120972356.
Turker, P. M. and Pala, F. K. (2020). The effect of algorithm education on students’ computer programming
self-efficacy perceptions and computational thinking skills. International Journal of Computer Science
Education in Schools, 3(3):19–32. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i3.69.
Ubaidullah, N. H., Mohamed, Z., Hamid, J., Sulaiman, S., and Yussof, R. L. (2021). Improving novice
students’ computational thinking skills by problem-solving and metacognitive techniques. International
Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(6):88–108. https://doi.org/10.
26803/IJLTER.20.6.5.
Veddayana, C., Romadhon, S., Aldresti, F., and Suyono, S. (2023). Rasionalitas implementasi ChatGPT
dalam pembelajaran keterampilan menulis karya ilmiah. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa
dan Sastra Indonesia, pages 443–452. https://doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.11778.
Voon, X. P., Wong, S. L., Wong, L. H., Khambari, M. N. M., and Syed-Abdullah, S. I. S. (2022). Devel-
oping computational thinking competencies through constructivist argumentation learning: A problem-
solving perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(6):529–539.
https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.6.1650.
Yamin, S. (2021). E-book statistik tutorial statistik SPSS, LISREL, WARPLS, JASP. PT Dewangga
Energi International, Depok.
Yasin, M. and Nusantara, T. (2023). Characteristics of pattern recognition to solve mathematics problems
in computational thinking. In AIP Conference Proceedings, pages 2569, 040009. https://doi.org/
10.1063/5.0112171.
Yilmaz, R. and Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The Effect of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tool
use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers
and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(100147). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.
100147.
Zen, B. P., Fitriana, G. F., and Gustalika, M. A. (2021). Peran kompetensi melalui berfikir komputasi
dalam membangun karir di dunia IT menuju Era Society 5.0. Dedikasi Sains dan Teknologi, 1(2):94–98.
https://doi.org/10.47709/dst.v1i2.1122.