• Lale Fatma Yulia Ningsih Univesitas Islam Al-Azhar


This paper examines the discursive construction of terrorism-related information conveyed on the Indonesian newspapers. The Jakarta Post, one of the most notable Indonesian English-language newspapers, have been covering terrorism related encounters in its editorial especially after the 2002 Bali bombing. This paper finds out the use of common definitions and terms as well as the discrepancies in the produced expression related to terrorism and extremism in the editorials the newspaper has published since 2014. It is found that the newspaper has symphatetically portrayed and supported the victims while it represented the perpetrators from their ideological perspectives and separating their ideologies from religious teaching practices in the country. Additionally, the newspaper identifies terrorism as threat to Indonesian democratic values and classifies terrorism as a serious issue endangering the country’s security and social stability. To the latter end, the newspaper suggested policy recommendation while at the same time criticizing the law enforcement for failures and in the end promoting secular values for the country in order to eradicate terrorism.


Abuza, Z. (2003). Militant Islam in Southeast Asia: Crucible of Terror. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Blommaert, J. and Bulcaen, C., 2000. Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, pp. 447-466.
Country Reports on Terrorism 2015
U.S. Department of State. (2018). Available at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/258249.pdf
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Cha nge.
Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. 2001. Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 121-138.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Psychology Press.
Fairclough, N. 2009. A Dialectical-relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in Social Research. Methods of critical discourse analysis, vol. 2, pp. 162-187.
Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Second edition. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J. and Wodak, R. 2011. Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction , pp. 357-378.
Fischer, Peter, Fischer, Julia K., Weisweiler, Silke, & Frey, Dieter. 2010. Terrorism as Collective Communication: The Collective Communication Model of Terrorism (CCMT). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 692-703.
Fowler, R. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the British Press. London: Routledge
Goodin, R. 2006.What’s Wrong with Terrorism. Cambridge: Polity.
Jørgensen, M.W. and Phillips, L.J. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Matusitz, J. 2013. Terrorism & Communication : A critical introduction. London: SAGE.
Meyer, M. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. Methods of Critical discourse Analysis , pp. 14-31.
Reddy, Michael, J. 1979. The Conduit Metaphor: A case of Frame conflict in Our Language about Language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 284-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmid, Alex, & Jongman, Albert. 2005. Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories, & literature (Rev., expanded, and updated ed. / prepared under the auspices of the Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.. ed.). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Wodak, R. 2001. What CDA is About: Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 1-13.