MORAL VALUE IN ONE PIECE ANIME MOVIE OF CHOPPER PLUS BLOOM IN THE WINTER
Abstract
This research aims to describe moral value in One Piece Anime Movie of Chopper Plus Bloom in The Winter created by Eiichiro Oda. The researchers obtained the data from the movie Video through watching, screenshot the video and copied the every single of scene in the movie video. Researchers took data only the appropriate the data which contained the moral value. The method used of this research was descriptive analysis method. The result of the research found that moral value was intrinsic moral value and three types of moral values that were the issue of human relationship with themselves, the human relationship with others, and relationship with God. Three types of those moral values shown (1) Chopper couldn’t accepted by others and It was shot by inhabitants (2) Luffy as a captain of the straw hat Pirate crew took responsibility to his crew by taking care of his crew (3) Chopper was considered as disgrace of his family because chopper has got blue nose and he was isolated by others and he found his the first friend dr Hiluluk as a form gratitude.
Keywords: Anime, moral values, one piece
References
Blommaert, J. and Bulcaen, C., 2000. Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, pp. 447-466.
Country Reports on Terrorism 2015 U.S. Department of State. (2018). Available at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/258249.pdf
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Cha nge.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. 2001. Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 121-138.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Psychology Press.
Fairclough, N. 2009. A Dialectical-relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in Social Research. Methods of critical discourse analysis, vol. 2, pp. 162-187.
Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Second edition. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J. and Wodak, R. 2011. Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction , pp. 357-378.
Fischer, Peter, Fischer, Julia K., Weisweiler, Silke, & Frey, Dieter. 2010. Terrorism as Collective Communication: The Collective Communication Model of Terrorism (CCMT). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 692-703.
Fowler, R. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the British Press. London: Routledge
Goodin, R. 2006.What’s Wrong with Terrorism. Cambridge: Polity.
Jørgensen, M.W. and Phillips, L.J. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
Matusitz, J. 2013. Terrorism & Communication : A critical introduction. London: SAGE.
Meyer, M. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. Methods of Critical discourse Analysis , pp. 14-31.
Reddy, Michael, J. 1979. The Conduit Metaphor: A case of Frame conflict in Our Language about Language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 284-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmid, Alex, & Jongman, Albert. 2005. Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories, & literature (Rev., expanded, and updated ed. / prepared under the auspices of the Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.. ed.). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Wodak, R. 2001. What CDA is About: Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 1-13.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
