Conceptual Metaphors of Nature in Sasak Language: A Cognitive Semantic Analysis of Indigenous Environmental Knowledge
Authors
-
Syamsurrijal
Universitas Bumigora, Mataram, Indonesia
-
Erwin Suhendra
Universitas Bumigora, Mataram, Indonesia
-
Wahyu Kamil Syarifaturrahman
Universitas Bumigora, Mataram, Indonesia
-
Muhlisin
Universitas Bumigora, Mataram, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.6485Keywords:
Cognitive Semantics, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Cultural Linguistics, Indigenous Ecological Knowledge, Sasak LanguageAbstract
Indigenous languages have been shown to play a crucial role in preserving ecological knowledge, cultural memory, and community identity. However, the semantic dimensions through which environmental knowledge is encoded in many indigenous languages remain underexplored, particularly in underrepresented Austronesian languages such as Sasak. The specific aims of this study are threefold: first, to identify the semantic categories of environmental concepts; second, to examine the conceptual metaphors underlying indigenous ecological knowledge; and third, to explain how these semantic structures reflect Sasak cultural cognition and identity. The present research employed a qualitative descriptive method within an interpretive paradigm. Data were collected from 25 native Sasak speakers selected through purposive sampling from East, Central, and West Lombok. The data comprised environmental vocabulary, proverbs, folklore narratives, oral traditions, and customary expressions gathered through semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and documentary analysis. The findings reveal that environmental knowledge in the Sasak language is organised into five interconnected semantic domains: water resources, landscapes, flora, fauna, and environmental processes. Of these domains, the water-related domain is particularly prominent, reflecting the ecological and cultural significance of water in Sasak society. The study further identifies several conceptual metaphors in which environmental phenomena function as source domains for abstract cultural meanings, including social harmony as ecological balance, causes as natural forces, and human identity as a rooted tree. These metaphorical structures illustrate how environmental observations are transformed into cognitive models for interpreting social relationships, moral values, and collective responsibilities. Furthermore, the analysis of environmental concepts embedded in proverbs, folklore, and cultural narratives reveals shared conceptualisations that emphasise harmony, interdependence, environmental stewardship, and communal identity.
References
Berikut adalah daftar referensi artikel ilmiah Anda yang sudah dibersihkan dari spasi berlebih, pemotongan baris (line break), dan tautan URL yang terputus akibat salin-tempel (copy-paste) dari PDF:
Aceves, P., & Evans, J. A. (2024). Mobilizing Conceptual Spaces: How Word Embedding Models Can Inform Measurement and Theory Within Organization Science. Organization Science, 35(3), 788–814. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.1686
Akera, A. (2007). Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge: Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and its Various Contexts. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 413–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706070742
Al Maawali, W. S. (2022). Experiential writing through connectivism learning theory: A case study of English language students in oman higher education. Reflective Practice, 23(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.2021167
Axelrod, L. (1994). Balancing Personal Needs with Environmental Preservation: Identifying the Values that Guide Decisions in Ecological Dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02421.x
Clark, K. M. (2024). Embodied Imagination: Lakoff and Johnson’s Experientialist View of Conceptual Understanding. Review of General Psychology, 28(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680231224400
Datta, R. (2015). A relational theoretical framework and meanings of land, nature, and sustainability for research with Indigenous communities. Local Environment, 20(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.818957
Ecklund, J. L. (1977). Sasak Cultural Change, Ritual Change, and the Use of Ritualized Language. Indonesia, 24, 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350916
Ellis, N. C. (2019). Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532
Ginting, S., Wongta, A., Ounjaijean, S., & Hongsibsong, S. (2025). Indonesia’s Indigenous Suku Anak Dalam: Knowledge for food and environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1587094
Glebkin, V. (2025). What does it mean for cognitive linguistics to be a usage-based discipline? Review of Cognitive Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00223.gle
Hubbi, H. S. H. (2024). Elements of Ecological Intelligence in Sasak Folklore. Sanggam, 1(1), 79–96. https://ejournal.riausastra.com/index.php/sanggam/article/view/7
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014
Jochim, M. A. (2013, September 11). Strategies for Survival: Cultural Behavior in an Ecological Context. Elsevier.
Jones, O., & Cloke, P. J. (2002). Tree cultures: The place of trees and trees in their place. Berg.
Kleinhempel, U. R., & Nicolaides, P. A. (2024). Sacred sites, identity, and resilience - on the retrieval of collective and historic identity across religious and cultural difference. Pharos Journal of Theology. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105133
Kozlowski, A. C., Taddy, M., & Evans, J. A. (2019). The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class through Word Embeddings. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 905–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419877135
Kravchenko, A. (2016). Two views on language ecology and ecolinguistics. Language Sciences, 54, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.12.002
Kubal, T., & Becerra, R. (2014). Social Movements and Collective Memory. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12166
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(80)80017-6
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008, December 19). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Magdoff, F. (2012). Harmony and Ecological Civilization: Beyond the Capitalist Alienation of Nature. Monthly Review, 64(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-064-02-2012-06_1
Mazzocchi, F. (2020). A deeper meaning of sustainability: Insights from indigenous knowledge. The Anthropocene Review, 7(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619898888
Mazzocchi, F. (2022). Diving Deeper into the Concept of ‘Cultural Heritage’ and Its Relationship with Epistemic Diversity. Social Epistemology, 36(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.2023682
Nasri, U., Indinabila, Y., & Rasyidi, A. H. (2024). Sasak Language in Rituals and Traditions: An Anthropological Analysis of Communication in the Lombok Community. Sabda: Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan, 19(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.14710/sabda.19.2.89-99
Noortyani, R., Mu’in, F., Munawwarah, R., & Normelani, E. (2023). Ethnolinguistic Study of the Traditional Indonesian Parenting song “Dindang Maayun Anak”: Cultural Reflection in the Socio-cultural Life of the Banjar in South Kalimantan. Sage Open, 13(2), 21582440231175127. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231175127
Raymond, C. M., Singh, G. G., Benessaiah, K., Bernhardt, J. R., Levine, J., Nelson, H., Turner, N. J., Norton, B., Tam, J., & Chan, K. M. A. (2013). Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human–Environment Relationships. BioScience, 63(7), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
Sabbaghian, A., & Oloumi, E. (2021). Globalization, Intensification of Urbanization and Decline of Linguistic Diversity. Political Quarterly, 51(3), 788–763. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2021.292458.1007517
Saha, A. (2022). Sustaining multicultural places from gentrified homogenisation of cities. Cities, 120, 103433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103433
Sharifian, F. (2003). On Cultural Conceptualisations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703322336625
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics and linguistic relativity. Language Sciences, 59, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.06.002
Shin, C., Tuah, D., & Yusriadi, Y. (2022). An Initial Qualitative Exploration of Economic, Cultural, and Language Changes in Telok Melano, Sarawak, Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(5), 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052655
Sinthumule, N. I. (2023). Traditional ecological knowledge and its role in biodiversity conservation: A systematic review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900
Syamsurrijal, S., Abdussamad, Z., & Muhid, A. (2023). Study of Sasaknese Proverb and Its Significances in Social life: Semiotics Rolland Barth Analysis. Humanitatis : Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v10i1.3498
Szombathy, Z. (2021). A Trust from the Ancestors: Islamic Ethics and Local Tradition in a Syncretistic Ritual in East-Central Sulawesi. Die Welt des Islams, 61(4), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-61020004
Tella, A., Jatto, E. O., & Ajani, Y. A. (2025). Preserving indigenous knowledge: Leveraging digital technology and artificial intelligence. IFLA Journal, 51(3), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251342505
Thompson, K.-L., Lantz, T. C., & Ban, N. C. (2020). A review of Indigenous knowledge and participation in environmental monitoring. Ecology and Society, 25(2), art10. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11503-250210
Trickett, E. J. (1984). Toward a distinctive community psychology: An ecological metaphor for the conduct of community research and the nature of training. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896748
Whittle, A., Vaara, E., & Maitlis, S. (2023). The Role of Language in Organizational Sensemaking: An Integrative Theoretical Framework and an Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1807–1840. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221147295
Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syamsurrijal, Erwin Suhendra, Wahyu Kamil Syarifaturrahman, Muhlisin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
