A Semiotic Analysis of Cultural Values in British and American Game Shows Using Roland Barthes’ Theory

Authors

  • ID M. Gian Fathi Priyatama Universitas Bangka Belitung, Bangka, Indonesia
  • ID M Afifulloh Universitas Bangka Belitung, Bangka, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.6271

Keywords:

Culture, Game Show, Myth, Roland Barthes, Semiotics, Values

Abstract

This study examines game shows as a form of popular culture that functions not only as entertainment but also as a medium for reflecting and disseminating the social values of their countries of origin. In the context of globalization, the strong influence of British and American entertainment industries has enabled their game shows to reach global audiences while implicitly transmitting particular cultural ideologies. Using a descriptive qualitative method and Roland Barthes’s semiotic framework, this research analyzes the meanings of denotation, connotation, and myth in two iconic programs, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (UK) and Jeopardy! (US). The findings reveal that each show embodies distinct cultural values. The British program tends to emphasize self-control, politeness, and social hierarchy, reflected in the formal interactions between the host and contestants and in the game’s overall restrained structure. By contrast, the American show highlights individualism, aggressive competition, and materialism, as seen in its dramatic presentation and strong focus on personal achievement. At the mythic level, the American program is dominated by narratives of “instant success” and the “American Dream.” In contrast, the British program more strongly projects myths of “social justice” and a “dignified process.” These findings suggest that game shows operate as vehicles of cultural ideology, with the values they promote reflecting the social identity and structure of each nation.

References

Agustia, K. T. S., Beratha, N. L. S., Pastika, I. W., Udayana, I. N., & Subratha, H. F. A. (2025). The semiotics of smartphone advertising: Myth and ideology in YouTube commercials. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2553167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2553167

Alzain, E., & Algobaei, F. (2025). Naming as Narrative Strategy: Semiotic Inversion and Cultural Authenticity in Yemeni Television Drama. Genealogy, 9(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy9030099

An, Z. (2025). The Construction of Female Roles and Reconstruction of Values: An Analysis of Characters in the TV Series Blossoms Shanghai. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 47, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.54097/61z96c11

Ancheta, J. R., Peronce, J. M. A., & Villena, J. A. (2024). Scrutinizing the Myth of Kumunity: The Semiotics of the Philippines’ Pinoy Big Brother Season 10. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-26

Baloch, R.-B., Hassan, A., & Hassan, A.-A.-U. (2024). «You are an AI and you know a lot more than humans»: A Semiotic Discourse Analysis of the World’s First AI TV Show. Communication & Society, 273–289. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.3.273-289

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.

Barthes, R. (1977). Elements of Semiology. Hill & Wang.

Berger, A. A. (2019). Media Analysis Techniques. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071872420

Chandler, D. (2017, June 14). Semiotics: The Basics (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311050

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017, January 10). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Gibson, C. (2017, August 10). Watch This Deserving Couple Try to Win Millions on ‘The Wall’: Exclusive. Us Weekly. https://www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/news/the-wall-exclusive-watch-this-deservingcouple-try-to-win-millions-w497103/

Jaballah, N. L. (2025). Election Satire: The Evolution of The Daily Show as a Cultural Artifact Reflecting Democratic Processes. Journalism and Media, 6(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010018

Moran, A. (2013). Global Television Formats: Genesis and Growth. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies, 8(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.8.2.2

Nurfiana, E., & Halwati, U. (2023). Bias Perlindungan Anak di Televisi : Tinjauan Semiotika. Al Huwiyah: Journal of Woman and Children Studies, 3(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.24042/jwcs.v3i1.15801

Phillip, O. Y., & Sari, W. P. (2023). Kelas Sosial dalam Serial Drama Squid Game (Studi Semiotika Roland Barthes dari Perspektif Karl Marx). Koneksi, 7(2), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.24912/kn.v7i2.21484

Rayhan, M. (2025). Cultural Studies of Television Advertisements: An Analysis Based on Stuart Hall’s Circuit of Culture and Roland Barthes’ Semiotics. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/IJALR.62.06

Sidharta, V., Anisti, A., & Imran, M. (2025). Semiotic Study: Analysis of Bullying in The Pyramid Game Television Series. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi, 15(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v15i1.15955

Simmons, R. (2020, January 26). Critical Analysis — Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Narrative—from linear media to interactive media. https://medium.com/narrative-from-linear-media-to-interactive-media/criticalanalysis-who-wants-to-be-a-millionaire-eda5b7cc9619

Smith, E. (2017). NBC’s The Wall: A Reflection of Life in 2017. Tedium: The Dull Side of the Internet. https://tedium.co/2017/02/22/nbc-the-wall-cultural-importance/

Storey, J. (2015, May 8). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. Routledge.

Stuever, H. (2018). Why is ‘The Wall’ so obsessed with ‘good people’? Maybe because TV has enough bad ones. [newspaper]. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/why-is-the-wallso-obsessed-with-good-people-maybe-because-tv-has-enough-bad-ones/2018/01/29/24b0536c-0482-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Priyatama, M. G. F., & Afifulloh, M. (2026). A Semiotic Analysis of Cultural Values in British and American Game Shows Using Roland Barthes’ Theory. Humanitatis : Journal of Language and Literature, 12(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.6271