Artificial Intelligence Writing Assistants as Reflective Partners: A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Non-English Academic Context

Authors

  • ID Hikma Tansilo STKIP Muhammadiyah Pagaralam, Pagaralam, Indonesia
  • ID Yuyun Setiawan Putra STKIP Muhammadiyah Pagaralam, Pagaralam, Indonesia
  • ID Andini Septama Sari STKIP Muhammadiyah Pagaralam, Pagaralam, Indonesia
  • ID Tommy Hastomo STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.5836

Keywords:

Argumentative Writing, Artificial Intelligence Writing Assistants, Digital Pedagogy, Higher Education, Indonesia

Abstract

Argumentative writing is an essential academic skill in higher education; however, students in non-English academic contexts frequently encounter difficulties in developing coherent arguments, organizing ideas logically, and integrating supporting evidence effectively. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Writing Assistants (AIWAs), particularly ChatGPT, in improving Indonesian undergraduate students’ argumentative writing performance. This study employed a mixed-methods approach with a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design. Forty fourth-semester undergraduate students were divided equally into an experimental group receiving AI-assisted feedback through ChatGPT and a control group receiving conventional teacher and peer feedback. Quantitative data were collected through argumentative writing tests and analyzed using paired-samples t-tests, independent-samples t-tests, and gain score analysis. Qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews to provide complementary insights into students’ learning experiences. The results revealed that both groups improved after the intervention; however, the experimental group achieved significantly higher posttest scores (M = 82.70) than the control group (M = 76.90), with a statistically significant difference (p = .005). Qualitative findings further indicated that AIWAs facilitated iterative revision, strengthened coherence and argumentative organization, and enhanced students’ confidence in writing. The findings suggest that AIWAs can serve as effective reflective partners in argumentative writing instruction and offer considerable pedagogical potential to support academic literacy development and digital transformation in higher education, particularly in non-English academic contexts.

References

Balraj, B. M. (2025). Exploring the Use of ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Systematic Literature Review on Undergraduates’ Perceptions. Arab World English Journal, (1), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI.20

Bašić, Ž., Banovac, A., Kružić, I., & Jerković, I. (2023). ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 750. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02269-7

Chemaya, N., & Martin, D. (2024). Perceptions and detection of AI use in manuscript preparation for academic journals (J. Blake, Ed.). PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0304807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304807

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017, December 12). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

El-Garawany, M. S. M. (2024). The Effects of a QuillBot-Based Intervention on English Language Majors’ EFL Writing Performance, Apprehension, and Self-Efficacy. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43, 167–189. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.10

Hamamah, Emaliana, I., Hapsari, Y., Degeng, P. D. D., & Fadillah, A. C. (2023). Using Nominal Group Technique to Explore Publication Challenges and the Usefulness of AI-Based Writing Technologies: Insights From Indonesian Scholars. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(8), 2038–2047. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.20

Hastomo, T., Sari, A. S., Widiati, U., Ivone, F. M., Zen, E. L., & Andianto, A. (2025). Exploring EFL Teachers’ Strategies in Employing AI Chatbots in Writing Instruction to Enhance Student Engagement. World Journal of English Language, 15(7), 93. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n7p93

Hastomo, T., Sari, A. S., Widiati, U., Ivone, F. M., Zen, E. L., & Kholid, M. F. N. (2025). Does Student Engagement with Chatbots Enhance English Proficiency? ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 22(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.22.1.93-109

Heintz, K., Roh, Y., & Lee, J. (2022). Comparing the accuracy and effectiveness of Wordvice AI Proofreader to two automated editing tools and human editors. Science Editing, 9(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.261

Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605

Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7

Milton, C., Vidhya, L., & Thiruvengadam, G. (2024). Examining the Impact of AI-Powered Writing Tools on Independent Writing Skills of Health Science Graduates. Advanced Education, 12(25), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.315068

Mohammed, S. I., Jabbar Kadhim, D., Zuheir Al-Metwali, B., Mudher Mikhael, E., & Mohammed Hassan, N. (2025). Academic Staff Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Pharmaceutical Sciences Research and Writing: A Qualitative Study. Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 33, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.31351/vol33iss(4SI)pp12-19

Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

Ng, H. Y., Hsu, T.-Y., Min, J., Kim, S., Rossi, R. A., Yu, T., Jung, H., & Huang, T.-H. K. (2025). Understanding How Paper Writers Use AI-Generated Captions in Figure Caption Writing. In Q. Wang, W. Yin, A. Aich, Y. Suh, & K.-C. Peng (Eds.), AI for Research and Scalable, Efficient Systems (pp. 173–192, Vol. 2533). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-8912-5_8

Pryma, V., Pelivan, O., Teletska, T., Tsobenko, O., & Zagrebelna, N. (2025). AI Writing Assistants and Student Competence: A Linguistic Aspect. Arab World English Journal, (1), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI.18

Putra, Y. S., Tansilo, H., Hastomo, T., Sari, A. S., & Aguilar, M. G. W. (2025). Efficacy of AI-based Text-to-Speech in Indonesian pronunciation training for foreign speakers (BIPA): A mixed-method analysis. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 5(2), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v5i2.12403

Sanosi, A. B. (2022). The Impact of Automated Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Academic Writing Accuracy. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2202301S

Sari, A. S., Widiati, U., Zein, E. L., & Suharyadi, S. (2026). From classroom to autonomy: A systematic literature review of self-regulated learning strategies in English language teaching. Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 7(1), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v7i1.24739

Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Perceptions and Use of AI Chatbots among Students in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies. Education Sciences, 14(8), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080922

Shahsavar, Z., Kafipour, R., Khojasteh, L., & Pakdel, F. (2024). Is artificial intelligence for everyone? Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant for medical students. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1457744. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1457744

Tuong, T. P. L., & Tran, T.-T. (2025). The Differential Impact of AI Tools Among EFL University Learners: A Process Writing Approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.24

Van De Poel, K., & Gasiorek, J. (2024). Using AI to expand the “Toolbox” for EAP writing instruction: Student experiences and perceptions of ChatGPT’s instructional potential. AILA Review. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24029.van

Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) authoring apps. TESOL Journal, 14(3), e716. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Tansilo, H., Putra, Y. S., Sari, A. S., & Hastomo, T. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Writing Assistants as Reflective Partners: A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Non-English Academic Context. Humanitatis : Journal of Language and Literature, 12(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.5836