Analysis of Frontier’s Internet Network Quality

  • Maya Sari Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Irwan Sembiring Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Hindriyanto Dwi Purnomo Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana


The demands of internet networks are ever increasing. This is caused by a huge number of applications that use the internet as their basic service and more affordable equipment that can connect to the internet. These conditions are raising a way to measure the quality of network services to see how well it could serve its user, especially regarding the internet. In this study, the parameters used to determine QoS (Quality of Service) are throughput, packet loss, delay and Jitter. Locations of measurement are wired and internet networks at the selected institute which is the shanti buana institute, bengkayang regency. The measurement method used is Quality of Service (QoS). This method is applied when analyzing the quality of the internet network. The results are very satisfactory, while the result of throughput methods are85.95 Mbps, and the amount of packet loss has a very small percentage, namely 1%. The amount of delay obtained is 46,741 ms, while the Jitter is 42,716 ms.


[1] I. S. Bhuana, “Informasi Umum – Institut Shanti Bhuana.” 2020.
[2] A. Callado et al., “A survey on internet traffic identification,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 37–52, 2014, doi: 10.1109/SURV.2009.090304.
[3] M. Hemmati, B. McCormick, and S. Shirmohammadi, “Fair and Efficient Bandwidth Allocation for Video Flows Using Sigmoidal Programming,” no. July, pp. 226–231, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ism.2018.0052.
[4] M. Amiri, H. Al Osman, and S. Shirmohammadi, “Datacenter Traffic Shaping for Delay Reduction in Cloud Gaming,” pp. 569–574, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ism.2016.0124.
[5] M. N. Billiranto, U. Terbuka, W. Inayanto, and U. Terbuka, “Evaluasi Kualitas Jaringan Komputer di Lingkungan Universitas Terbuka,” researchGate, no. December 2018, 2018.
[6] A. Wijaya and R. Rasmila, “Analisa Keandalan Jaringan Internet Dengan Pendekatan Quality of Service Pada R.S Kusta Dr. Rivai Abdullah Palembang,” J. Ilm. Matrik, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018.
[7] F. Fatoni and S. Sandra, “Evaluasi Kualitas Dan Pengguna Jaringan Internet,” J. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2018.
[8] A. Mikola and M. Sari, “Analisis Sistem Jaringan Berbasis QoS untuk Hot-Spot Di Institut Shanti Bhuana,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2022, doi: 10.46229/jifotech.v2i1.398.
[9] R. Towidjojo, Mikrotik Kung Fu Kitab 3 [ Edisi 2019 ]. 2019.
[10] M. Diponegoro, A. Ashari, M. Kom, U. G. Mada, and M. Diponegoro, “Analisis Quality Of Service ( Qos ) Pada Jaringan Internet Dengan Metode Fixed Daily Measurement Interval ( Fdmi ) Dan Non Fdmi Studi Kasus : Ugm-Hotspot Pascasarjana Ilmu Komputer Abstract Analysis Of Quality Of Service ( Qos ) In Internet Network Using,” UGM, 2018.
[11] A. Siswanto, U. I. Riau, A. Tedyyana, and P. N. Bengkalis, “Manajemen Penggunaan Bandwidth Dan Monitoring Akses Data,” no. March 2018, 2018, [Online]. Available:
[12] T. A. Darsono, “Analisis Kinerja Jaringan Penghubung Antar Gedung Menggunakan WiFi (Studi Kasus: Jaringan Komputer Universitas Musamus Merauke),” 2018.
[13] T. A. Darsono, I. H. Wayangkau, and Marsujitullah, “Analysis of WiFi Network Performance Using FDMI Method,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1569, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1569/4/042005.
[14] B. Riki C, D. Samardzija, O. Cadovski, and T. Maruna, “Cellular network bandwidth prediction in consumer applications,” Dig. Tech. Pap. - IEEE Int. Conf. Consum. Electron., vol. 2021-Janua, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICCE50685.2021.9427757.
[15] S. E. Prasetyo and E. Tan, “Analisis Quality of Service (QoS) Jaringan Wireless 2.4 GHz dan 5 GHz di Dalam Ruangan dengan Hambatan Kaca,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. Asia, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 103, 2021, doi: 10.32815/jitika.v15i2.609.
[16] J. Ma and Y. Zhang, “Research on trusted evaluation method of user behavior based on AHP algorithm,” Proc. - 2018 7th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Med. Educ. ITME 2018, pp. 588–592, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ITME.2018.39.