Mitigasi Relawan Muda Tangguh Bencana

Nur Vita Laily; Shinta Widia Ardani; Andhy Permadi; Ahmad Sofiyyul Mubarok

doi:10.30812/adma.v4i2.3389

Nur Vita Laily Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Shinta Widia Ardani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Andhy Permadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Ahmad Sofiyyul Mubarok Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30812/adma.v4i2.3389

Keywords: Disaster Mitigation, Participatory Action Research, Young Volunteers

Abstract

Bajulan Village is a disaster-prone village which has experienced several disasters such as flash floods in 2020, fires in 2021, and landslides in 2021, 2022, 2023. This service aims to build a community of young Bajulan volunteers who are able to help other communities in dealing with all disasters, especially landslides. Not only that, this service also aims to install disaster signs to provide information to the community about which areas have a higher risk of landslides. The methodology used is Participatory Action Research. This method is used because it makes the community play an active role as the main actor in solving problems and researchers only act as facilitators. Then this method is used to get maximum results. In this method there is also an important stage called Focus Group Discussion which is a forum for residents to voice what their problems are and how residents can overcome them. Researchers invited the Regional Disaster Management Agency as a speaker on disaster mitigation education in the discussion. The result of this service is data that shows the main causes of landslides. Then, data shows how residents deal with landslides. Another result is the formation of a community of young volunteers for disaster resilience and disaster signs.

References

Badan Koordinasi Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BAKORNAS PB). (2007). Pengenalan Karakteristik Bencana Dan Upaya Mitigasinya Di Indonesia. Badan Koordinasi Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.
Boateng, W. (2012). Evaluating the Efficacy of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Qualitative Social Research. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 54–57.
Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1
Fakhrurozi, J., Pasha, D., Jupriyadi, & Anggrenia, I. (2021). Pemertahanan Sastra Lisan Lampung Berbasis Digital Di Kabupaten Pesawaran. Journal Sosial Science and Teknology for Community Service (JSSTCS), 2(1), 27–36.
O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Putera, R. E. (2007). Analisis terhadap Program-program Penanggulangan Kemiskinan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Indonesia. DEMOKRASI, 6(1), 37–38.
Putri, R. A., & Sembiring, S. B. (2021). Implementation of Desktop Publishing Application for Flyer and Business Card Design with Participatory Action Research (PAR) Method. J-IbM: Jurnal IPTEK Bagi Masyarakat, 1(1), 1–7.
Rahman, A. Z. (2015). Kajian Mitigasi Bencana Tanah Longsor Di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. GEMA PUBLICA, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14710/gp.1.1.2015.1-14
Ridho, M. Z. (2020). Signifikansi Metode (PAR) Dalam Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Umat (BAZDA Kabupaten Serang). DEDIKASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 13(1), 1–13.
Suwaryo, P. A. W., & Yuwono, P. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Pengetahuan Masyarakat dalam Mitigasi Bencana Alam Tanah Longsor. The 6th University Research Colloquium 2017 Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang, Proceeding 6th University Research Colloquium 2017: Seri Humaniora, Sosial, dan Agama, 305–314.

Username
Password
Remember me